Profiles people listing in a scrolling container.
  1. Home
  2. Faculty

Todd Washington, PhD

Professor of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

Introduction

Classical, replicative DNA polymerases synthesize DNA in a template-dependent fashion with remarkable efficiency and fidelity. They achieve rates as high as 1,000 nucleotide incorporations per second with error frequencies as low as one error per one million nucleotides incorporated. What these amazing enzymes cannot do, however, is replicate through DNA lesions that arise spontaneously or are formed upon attack by a plethora of DNA damaging agents including oxygen free radicals and radiation. Consequently, organisms have evolved specialized polymerases to replicate through lesions. DNA polymerase eta is one such specialized polymerase. Inactivation of DNA polymerase eta in yeast leads to an increase in the frequency of ultraviolet (UV) radiation-induced mutations. This indicates that the replication of UV- induced lesions by this polymerase is error-free ( i.e. , not mutagenic). In vitro , DNA polymerase eta has the unprecedented ability to accurately replicate through a thymine dimer, a common UV-induced lesion. Furthermore, defects in human DNA polymerase eta are responsible for the cancer prone genetic disorder, the variant form of xeroderma pigmentosum. DNA polymerase zeta is another specialized polymerase. Inactivation of DNA polymerase zeta in yeast leads to a dramatic decrease in the frequency of mutations induced by a wide range of DNA damaging agents. This indicates that the replication of numerous lesions by this polymerase is mutagenic. In vitro , DNA polymerase zeta has the remarkable ability to efficiently extend from primer- terminal mismatches containing template lesions. Thus, DNA polymerase zeta likely functions in the mutagenic replication of damaged DNA by extending from nucleotides inserted opposite lesions by other polymerases?often the classical, replicative polymerases themselves. Our long- term goal is to understand the mechanisms of DNA polymerases involved in both mutagenic and error-free replication of DNA damage at the thermodynamic, kinetic, and structural level. We use a variety of approaches including equilibrium binding techniques, transient state kinetic analyses (both rapid chemical quench flow and fluorescence-based stopped flow methods), and the characterization of mutant proteins generated by site-directed mutagenesis. We hope that this work will contribute to our understanding of the origins of mutations and cancers and perhaps gain new insights into their prevention.

Current Positions

  • Professor of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
  • Professor of Radiation Oncology

Education

  • BS in Biology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
  • BA in Philosophy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
  • PhD in Biochemistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
  • Postdoctoral Fellow, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, Texas

Graduate Program Affiliations

Center, Program and Institute Affiliations

Research Interests

  • Areas of Research Interest and Current Projects

Selected Publications

  • Boehm EM, Washington MT (2016) “R.I.P. to the PIP: PCNA-binding motif no longer considered specific.” Bioessays 38, 1117-1122.
  • Fairlamb MS, Spies M, Washington MT, Freudenthal BD (2023). Visualizing the coordination of apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease (APE1) and DNA polymerase β during base excision repair. J Biol Chem. 2023 May;299(5):104636.
  • Ling JA, Gildenberg MS, Honda M, Kondratick CM, Spies M, Washington MT (2023). Fork-Remodeling Helicase Rad5 Preferentially Reverses Replication Forks with Gaps in the Leading Strand. Journal of Molecular Biology. 435(4).
  • Weaver TM, Cortez LM, Khoang TH, Washington MT, Agarwal PK, Freudenthal BD (2020). Visualizing Rev1 catalyze protein-template DNA synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117, 25494-25504.
  • Gildenberg MS, Washington MT (2019). Conformational flexibility of fork re-modeling helicase Rad5 shown by full-ensemble hybrid methods. PLoS One 14, e0223875.
  • Weaver TM, Washington MT, Freudenthal BD. New insights into DNA polymerase mechanisms provided by time-lapse crystallography. (2022) Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2022 Sep 26;77:102465. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2022.102465. [Epub ahead of print] Review. PubMed PMID: 36174287; NIHMSID:NIHMS1844159. Dr. Freudenthal was invited to contribute this review article to this journal. I wrote the initial draft of this paper and was a co-corresponding author.
  • Weaver TM, Click TH, Khoang TH, Washington MT, Agarwal PK, Freudenthal BD (2022). Mechanism of nucleotide discrimination by the translesion synthesis polymerase Rev1. Nat Commun. May 24;13(1):2876. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30577-0. PubMed PMID: 35610266; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9130138.
  • Ling JA, Frevert Z, Washington MT (2022). Recent Advances in Understanding the Structures of Translesion Synthesis DNA Polymerases. Genes (Basel). 2022 May 20;13(5). doi: 10.3390/genes13050915. Review. PubMed PMID: 35627300; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9141541.
  • Tibbs J, Ghoneim M, Caldwell CC, Buzynski T, Bowie W, Boehm EM, Washington MT, Tabei SM, Spies M (2021). KERA: analysis tool for multi-process, multi-state single-molecule data. Nucleic Acids Res. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab087. PMID: 33660771.
  • Kondratick CM, Washington MT, Spies M (2021). Making Choices: DNA Replication Fork Recovery Mechanisms. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 113:27-37. PubMed PMID: 33967572; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8098667. DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2020.10.001.